So They Only Bought The House To Make $$

And not to live in. So nothing left but to sell it.

1135 Ocean View

A wrench has been thrown into the spokes of a lawsuit challenging Pacific Grove’s system of determining what properties can provide short-term rentals when on Wednesday the home at the center of the case was sold.

The current case involves Susan and William Hobbs, a Pacific Grove couple who filed a lawsuit against the city in the summer of 2019 in Monterey County Superior Court, alleging that Pacific Grove denied their due process rights by refusing to renew a short-term rental license the Hobbs possessed.

So They Only Bought The House To Make $$

City Reveals It’s Checkbook

Took some searching through the city website schlock but found it. Go here: Pacific Grove / Annual (opengov.com) Then scroll down to Data, where it defaults to Summary Table and finally click Check Register. You’ll have to scroll to the right to get to the good information, and maybe click on a column divider to widen the cells enough to read. But hey, that’s what we get when there’s no schlock.

City councilman Luke Coletti proposed that city hall publish the monthly check register so taxpayers can easily see how much the city spends monthly on things like pension costs, water and power expenses, reimbursement to city employees and many other things.
Coletti, who was elected in November 2020, made a campaign promise to “establish policies and programs that ensure fiscal transparency and public access.” City staffers agreed to publish the information. “It’s a total no-brainer as far as I’m concerned,” he told The Pine Cone about city hall’s release of the check register. “Carmel, as well as many other local jurisdictions and agencies, have been releasing their registers for years. Pacific Grove used to — a long time ago — and I wanted to reestablish the practice,” Coletti said.

City Reveals It’s Checkbook

Henry (Not A Lawyer) Leinen Sentenced

This website received an official registered letter demanding the first story about his guilty plea to (not a lawyer) services be removed.

on May 27, 2021, Henry Leinen, age 67 of Pacific Grove, was sentenced for providing legal document assistant services after his registration to perform such services was revoked by Monterey County. Leinen’s registration to provide these services was revoked as a result of his convictions for unauthorized practice of law and forgery in 2017. This new misdemeanor conviction was also a violation of Leinen’s probation in his 2017 case. Leinen was sentenced to 20 days jail, which may be served through the work alternative program, in addition to a $1,000 fine.

Henry Not A Lawyer Leinen Sentenced

 

Fired Cop Fights To Get Job Back

Lawsuits we bound to happen. Hoping for a reinstatement or big payout.

He also contends that the Pacific Grove police officers union’s policy manual allows employees to “oppose, support or contradict any social issue, cause or religion,” which is what he said he did in the Parler posts. “I didn’t represent myself as a police officer,” Gonzalez said. “I was totally off duty when I made those posts, and I was speaking to a matter of public concern, which is within my First Amendment rights. I didn’t violate any law and I didn’t violate any policy.”

It’s just crazy to be labeled something like a racist for not supporting an organization, which to me is anti-police.”

Fired Cop Fights To Get Job Back

Taking Caution Investigating Graffiti

pacific grove graffiti help

 

The Pacific Grove Police Department is looking for people who witnessed a graffiti spree Sunday night.

Residents awoke to find the several-block radius between Robert Down Elementary School and the Pacific Grove Museum of Natural History covered in graffiti, with taggers hitting 12 different spots over the course of the night.

Problem: depending on the source of the expressive paintwork, arresting anyone or covering up the graffiti might be seen as a racist response to free expression. Watch your backs.

graffiti on parklet

Taking Caution Investigating Graffiti

David Stamm Arrested Again For Lewd Acts With 12 And 13 Year Olds.

This is not a repeat from 2009

Monterey County District Attorney Jeannine Pacioni announced Friday that David Russell Stamm, 58, of Pacific Grove is charged with allegedly committing lewd acts upon a child under the age of 14 in 1998, 1999 and the summer of 2005.

The Monterey County Sheriff’s Office, the California Highway Patrol, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Monterey County District Attorney’s Office arrested Stamm and he is currently in custody at the Monterey County Jail.

The charges are the result of an investigation commenced by the Federal Bureau of Investigation in 2018 by the Washington Field Office, assisted by the Pacific Grove Police Department and the Monterey County District Attorney’s Office.

David Stamm Arrested Again For Lewd Acts With 12 And 13 Year Olds.

P.G. Man Assaults Woman In Hotel

A muffin was involved.

A jury found David Michael Burge, 30, a resident of Pacific Grove, guilty of four felony charges, including inflicting corporal injury on a person with whom he had a dating relationship, two counts of assault with force likely to produce great bodily injury, and communicating a criminal threat.
On Oct. 5, 2020, Jane Doe and Burge, her ex-boyfriend, were staying at a local inn when he became angry because she refused to warm up a frozen blueberry muffin for him.  In response, he smashed the muffin into her face and punched her in the face with a closed fist. When she called her mother after the incident, Burge told her that if she  called the police, he would kill her. Her mother overheard this threat. Burge made a second threat that he would get out of jail, come back, and kill her.

P.G. Man Assaults Woman In Hotel

Taxes From Vacation Rentals Yes! Code Enforcement No So Much

Grand Jury roasts the county.

The report criticizes what it calls the county’s decision to “consciously take a passive approach” to enforcement. It argues that approach has resulted in “significant growth” in the numbers of unpermitted vacation rentals while the county takes its time developing rules for the practice, and “increasing public tensions over this uncontrolled growth” as a result. It also suggests lack of enforcement and growth in the numbers will “likely magnify the difficult problems that the county must address when new ordinances are eventually enacted and take effect.”

Taxes From Vacation Rentals Yes! Code Enforcement No So Much